Putting Global Warming on Ice Essay Example for Free

Putting Global thaw on Ice EssayWhat makes the earths temperature rise and fall? Do greenhouse gases block solar heat from leaving the earth, or is it only a product of solar activity? many another(prenominal) a(prenominal) people stick theorized on what causes temperatures to change. A catch phrase named Global Warming came to popularity. environmentalists from all walks of life joined the world(prenominal) heat fight. According to Thomas OConnell the global melt tump over wasnt accepted in the 60s and 70s when he studied it. It only became popular recently in the 90s. Everyone believed that humans were causing a catastrophe by punching a whole into an ozone layer in the sky, letting harmful rays of fair weather in.People fought to shutdown plants in enunciate to stop the emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Everyone believed the global tippying claims coming from senators and environmentalists. Today in the 21st century, science has stepped up to disprove the common myths of global thawing. many a(prenominal) of the theories and claims of global warming argon easily disproved with science. Science is the only tool that can be utilize to tell whether theories argon fact or fiction. The first issue of global warming is the recent Kyoto protocol, an worldwide agreement k straightwaying to cut greenhouse emissions from successful countries.The international Kyoto protocol has been in debate for many years. The Kyoto protocol is an international treaty to reduce developed countrys greenhouse emissions, specifically carbon dioxide, to 7% downstairs their 1990 levels. As President Bush came to office he refused the U.S.s involvement in the treaty. President Bush wasnt veritable(a) the man that killed the idea for the U.S. (National ticker 2). A bill, stating that the U.S. wouldnt ratify any clime treaty that would harm the fall in States economically and would have no consequences for developing or 3rd World countries, was passed with a unanimous 95-0 select by the senate before President Bush was elected (National Center 2). The treaty isnt intimately global warming. It was designed in order to transfer success from developed nations handle the U.S. to developing or struggling countries (Tuccille 2). inquiry decl atomic number 18s that China, India, and Brazil who atomic number 18 not affected by the Kyoto Protocol get out add their carbon dioxide emissions by 16% more than the unite States veritable(a) withoutthe Protocol in effect (National Center 3). Proponents of the protocol confessed that the treaty would not have the beneficial environmental impacts advertised and that the costs of implementation would be oft higher(prenominal) than the public had been told (National Center 1). U.S. economy would suffer if we agreed to partake in the Kyoto scheme. Gasoline prices would increase by as much as 66 cents per gallon, electrical costs would too increase up to 80%, zero intensive prod ucts such as chemicals, steel, paper, and cars would rise in price by as much as 15%. (National Center 2). The economy of the USA would be devastated, states Thomas OConnell. The minority income would be let down by about 10%, 864,000 African Americans as well as 511,000 Hispanics would be unemployed (National Center 2).Oil and fuel used for farming would be taxed or restricted causing in a higher cost of producing and lower profits of products including corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, hogs, and milk (Heartland Institute 2 and 3). Businesses taxed by the government for their emissions would vector sum in raising costs for their consumers (Heartland Institute 3). New regulations would be implemented for automobiles making carpooling mandatory and would punish owners of trucks and sports cars. The average household income would even drop by about $2,700 (Heartland Institute 2). eve the unbiased and plausible Time magazine quoted, the campaign against global warming seemed to be ov er before it even started referring to the Kyoto Protocol (Tuccille 1). Are we prepared to disappear from the map in order to prevent 1 degree Celsius of warming for the next Century? One of the hot issues on global warming is that humankind has had something to do with the temperature. artificial emissions such as carbon dioxide have been claimed to cause global temperatures to increase over the years. Ever since the industrial revolution in the 1940s man has continued to emit gases such as CO2 into the air. many people claim that CO2 is what blocks heat from escaping the atmosphere. They also claim that mankind has poked a hole in something called the ozone layer, a protective layer above the atmosphere that keeps harmful UV radiation out, which lets more solar rays in. How convenient. The fact is that 98% of these greenhouse gases are natural to the earth. globe has not emitted them and they are not pollutants. They are mostly piddle vapors and clouds (Zipperer 2). Does that so und dangerous to you? The earthhas even cut down on the post of carbon dioxide emissions from the years 1973-1990 (Lindzen 1 and 2).Even if we did have a lot of CO2 in the air evidently the effects wouldnt be catastrophic. In the past the atmosphere has had much more amounts of CO2 in it before without significant increases in temperature (Lindzen 4). Richard Lindzen, a professor of meteorology at MIT, claims that a two-bagger of CO2 in the earths atmosphere would only result in a 1 degree Celsius increase in global temperature (National Center 3). Another greenhouse gas is methane. Methane is more harmful than CO2 simply will not increase significantly for another speed of light years if it continues at its current rate (Michaels 1). Many credible experts in the field of science have agreed that man is not responsible. over 17,000 scientists from all over the world have signed a petition declaring that there is no persuade scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxi de, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the earths atmosphere and disruption of the earths climate (Heartland Institute 5). Even if there were significant cases of warming global temperatures the effects wouldnt be as tragic as everyone thinks. on that point are many benefits to the warming of the earth, as there are consequences. Warming on a global scale would have dramatic effects on life and climates. Some effects may be harmful just now many of them are beneficial. Some ideas about global warming consequences are myths that are unlikely. Many people say that global warming is linked with the uprising in tropical storms. Storms such as hurricanes coming from the southeast into Florida coasts have been getting stronger for many years, but in 1991 there was a drought of storms that ranged to 1995. The amount and intensity fell way below the average, which suggests that these storms were not affected by th e warming of the earth (Bible Believers 3 and 4). Others claim that sea levels have risen all over the world because the cold ice caps are slowly melting due to the warming. Tests have proven that temperatures at the poles are rattling getting colder and that sea levels have been rising for centuries before we had any affect on the climate (Bible Believers 3). creator Vice President Al Gore spoke of diseases migrating due to climate warming. He spoke of diseases like the Black Plague and Cholera, which he believed werespread because of weather patterns. Rats, who spread the Black Plague, lived in both warm and cold climates so they had no reason to migrate. His second example Cholera has been a problem in both warm and cold climates and can be easily treated by purifying the water we drink (Heartland Institute 9). Many people have never heard possible benefits of global warming before. Having a warmer climate is very beneficial. Historically, very warm periods in time resulted in well-off life such as plants, animals, and fish (Bible Believers 4).Even large amounts of CO2 can be beneficial. more than CO2 in the atmosphere fuels plants, which makes more food for all walks of life. Vikings were once able to farm what is now a cold and icy Greenland (Zipperer 3). A warming of the earth would result in longer exploitation seasons and would deplete world hunger and crop failure (Robinson 3). Global warming wouldnt be all that bad, but we do not have a way to tell if there is or will be any warming because of the difficulty to shout out the weather.In order to make predictions about weather, people have designed computer models that estimate changes in weather patterns. The models are designed from past weather information and possible factors effecting the weather. What modelers do not know is that global weather is very hard to predict, maybe even impossible without the right understanding and tools for the job (Robinson 2). Factors such as clouds, precipit ation, oceans, and the sun are misunderstood and often underestimated (Zipperer 2). Modelers also leave out possible advances in the future such as nuclear energy and the positive effect it would have on the environment (Lindzen 2). Our current technology isnt even taut to world advanced enough.Errors in the data are equivalent to 50% (Lindzen 3). These computer models could not even predict weather from the past. While global temperatures have raised by .3 to .6 C over the past 100 years models have over predicted the increase to be from .7 to 1.4 C by the year 1990 (Heartland Institute 7). modality modelers have even inputted their own bias into the data, shifting variables to what they want them to be. temper modelers have been cheating for so long its almost become respectable, says Richard A. Kerr, a writer for Science magazine. Further seek on the field is necessary in order to accurately determine whether we have a problem or not.Many people of profession have studied global warming and what may affect the outcome of their results. When amount from the surface global temperatures have increased by about .6 degrees Celsius with a .2-degree misplay, but parts of the United States including the southeast have cooled polishedly since the late 19th century (NOAA 2). For those 100 years of slight warming, 70% of it occurred before the industrial revolution in 1940 in which man began to emit gases into the air (Zipperer 2). The surface on and around the equator has remained plus or minus 1 degree Celsius of its current temperature for billions of years (Lindzen 4). Research has also been done to determine the affect on rising and falling temperatures. Scientists have rig very close relations with solar activity from the sun and the current temperature patterns, which suggests that fluctuations in temperatures are out of our hands (NOAA 5). Satellites are the best way to determine global temperatures.They are unbiased and have only a 0.001-degree Cel sius of error (Heartland Institute 6). These satellites have confirmed that there is no evidence of global warming. If anything there is a slight cooling in the atmosphere (National Center 3). Very true agencies have done their own research on global warming. Many scientists have tested the greenhouse theory carefully and have found that greenhouse warming isnt even occurring and that rising temperatures are do to different stages of solar activity (Robinson 1). In 1995 the IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, did not prove that humans were affecting global temperatures (Heartland Institute 8). Their report, Climate Change, includes a statement, The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on the global climate (Heartland Institute 8). Dr. Roy Spencer, a meteorologist and team leader of the NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, quotes, The temperatures we measure from space are actually on a very slight downward trend since 1979 the trend is about 0.05C p er ex cooling (Heartland Institute 7).In a recent poll only 17% of the meteorological guild and the American Geophysical Society believe that global warming is a product of man (Bible Believers 2). Representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency are threatening to withdraw their support from a global warming turn over done by the government. They have said that the report has an extreme/alarmist tone and that it does not appear to plumb reflect the scientific literature and the historical record(Torres 1). The representatives claimed that the report also had scientifically inaccurate statements about the potential implications of climate change for air pollution and human (Torres 1 and 2). Usually, in scientific law, if a hypothesis fails through experimentation it should be discarded, but the theory of global warming and greenhouse gases as a result of man is still considered substantial hypothesis even though it has been proven to be unlikely (Robinson 2).The debate o f global warming may continue on for many years to come. valet may never see any rising in global temperatures, but nevertheless it will be speculated. Thomas OConnell At this moment in time there has not been any reliable and convincing evidence that the globe is dangerously warming. Global temperature is a product of natural variables that affect the earth. Man has little if any influence on this temperature. Many of the greenhouse claims have been poorly researched and have heretofore to be proven credible. Hopefully in the future science will prevail and provide the corporeal answer. Until then, people interested in global warming should do research of their own in order to formulate their own opinion. Life on earth has adapted or evolved to the environment. The earth will never adapt or change due to a single species the earth is far too powerful. As this paper comes to a close a quote sums up the main idea. Thomas OConnell once said, As the rhetoric of the proponents gives way to real problem or is this phenomena more closely related to political agendas. spastic wait for the science.